Written by Dr. Seshadri Kumar, August 21, 2011
There are a lot of "intellectuals" out there who go out making intellectual-sounding arguments against the anti-corruption movement - how it is undemocratic, anti-parliament, constitution-defeating, etc., etc., without a thought about the huge positive aspect of the movement and the mood of the people.
There are a lot of "intellectuals" out there who go out making intellectual-sounding arguments against the anti-corruption movement - how it is undemocratic, anti-parliament, constitution-defeating, etc., etc., without a thought about the huge positive aspect of the movement and the mood of the people.
I was responding to a comment from one such person to one of my articles, and I made a statement which made me realize something. This person was trying to suggest that if Anna Hazare succeeds in pushing through his law, based on sheer majority, without the 15-day review period, then it would set a bad precedent for anyone who could bulldoze parliament by a show of majority. What I said in response was, "India is a Hindu-majority country, but if you try to make a law that discriminates against Muslims, the crowds on the streets will not be people in favor of the bill, like it is now, but people against. I have enough faith in my country."
Special-Interest Groups
This made me think. Why is that? Because Muslims form a special-interest group that is linked with politicians and vote banks. In fact, so does most everyone. Try creating a law against Gujaratis, there will be an agitation - because Gujaratis form a special-interest group. Today there is an agitation in favor of a Telangana - because there is a special-interest group for Telangana. There is also a special-interest group against Telangana. But this goes for every group you can possibly imagine - women, children, Maharashtrians, Bengalis, Tamils, government employees, auto rickshaw drivers, dabbawalas, you name it. Create a law that goes against them and the next day you will have an agitation on the streets - headed by politicians. Why? Because there are votes involved here. Someone who is pro-Bengali or pro-Maharashtrian or pro-rickshaw drivers stands to gain from the votes of that vote bank.
The Anti-Corruption Vote Bank?
In contrast, an anti-corruption movement, by its very definition, has no vote bank. Why would any MP or MLA support an anti-corruption movement? There is no special-interest group for anti-corruption, because the very title "anti-corruption" implies no special favors. In addition, there is a huge governmental office lobby that stands to lose from this - from your office peon to the highest office-bearer in the land.
This is why they are using every trick in the book, and every pseudo-intellectual argument, to try and defeat this bill. You cannot tell the truth, viz., that it will hurt your livelihood, so you couch your argument in terms of high-sounding phrases like "protect the constitution," "parliamentary procedures," "tradition," "open discourse," and so on. What amazes me is that a large number of educated people believe this nonsense.
Jai Hind!
Seshadri Kumar
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.